Prusament Woodfill vs PLA

Compare Prusament Woodfill and PLA filaments side-by-side. See which one is best for your 3D printing project.

Detailed Comparison

Property
Prusament Woodfill
PLA
Tier Rating
Tier null
Tier A
Family
Specialty
PLA
Nozzle Temp
195°C
185-235°C
Bed Temp
60°C
50-60°C
Enclosure
not needed
not needed
Cooling
High part cooling usually beneficial
Moisture Sensitivity
low
moderate

Strengths Comparison

Prusament Woodfill Strengths

    PLA Strengths

    • Easiest to print, cheap, widely available, fast, good bridges/overhangs, easy support removal
    • Stiff non-composite thermoplastic, good tensile strength

    Considerations

    Prusament Woodfill Caveats

      PLA Caveats

      • Creeps under sustained load
      • Poor heat resistance, UV degradation, can shatter on drops
      • Not great for sanding/gluing/painting/touch-ups

      Frequently Asked Questions

      Is Prusament Woodfill or PLA better for 3D printing?
      PLA is generally rated higher (Tier A) compared to Prusament Woodfill (Tier null). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Prusament Woodfill is best for various applications, while PLA is best for Easiest to print, cheap, widely available, fast, good bridges/overhangs, easy support removal.
      What are the temperature differences between Prusament Woodfill and PLA?
      Prusament Woodfill prints at 195°C nozzle / 60°C bed. PLA prints at 185-235°C nozzle / 50-60°C bed.
      Do Prusament Woodfill and PLA need an enclosure?
      Prusament Woodfill: not needed. PLA: not needed.
      Which is more beginner-friendly: Prusament Woodfill or PLA?
      Both Prusament Woodfill and PLA are beginner-friendly options.

      Other Popular Comparisons